RE: Gnumeric 0.76 experiences (long)
- From: Phillip Shelton <shelton usq edu au>
- To: gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: Gnumeric 0.76 experiences (long)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:08:07 +1000
<Rider>I am just a lurker</Rider>
If the use types in an invalid formula do you not have the input buffer that
you can just put into a string array? or does trying to parse it loose that
data?
Phill
-----Original Message-----
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 11:35:38PM -0700, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote:
Jody Goldberg wrote:
Not a small change. Internal data structures assume sanity. What
you see on the screen or type on the keyboard have robust checking
to ensure that only sane things make their way into the core. Send
a sample and I'll see what can be done.
desire.Wouldn't it be possible to create those invalid formulas as
strings in gnumeric. This would make it quite easy for
users to fix them
if they so I believe the main cooncern is that currently the
information hidden in those formulas is completely lost.
This would be a huge task. Not impossible, but large. Stringifying
an expression assumes that the expression is valid. In some cases
we'll be able to, lets tackle it on a case by case basis. Please
forward sheets that do not load, and we can catalog which problems
are fixable, which are handlable, and which are too damn much work.
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]