Re: ObjectHandler, QuantLibAddin, and QuEPs
- From: Ferdinando Ametrano <nando ametrano net>
- To: QuantLib-dev <quantlib-dev lists sourceforge net>
- Cc: gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ObjectHandler, QuantLibAddin, and QuEPs
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:25:36 +0200
Hi all
Jody Goldberg wrote:
I'm definitely already on some of the quantlib lists, possibly not
that one please add me.
I've added you and Eric to quantlib-dev
Gnumeric already has a significant set of financial analytics,
and I'd like to see that expanded to use quantlib.
this is great news.
IDL is a non-starter. It is nowhere near reach enough to supply the
amount of documentation and detail to generate the code I'd like to
see. A config_file and some sort of script, possibly in python
seems like a reasonable approach. I've seen it used successfully in
things like pygtk and gtk#.
I definitively trust you on such an issue.
By defining the api using a format we
control it's possible to get all the relevent information.
Something as simple as an xml based format would be fine. The goal
is to provide things like
- name
- short func description
- per argument name, description, type
- Return type
- long func description (algorithm, model, possible a url to
more docs)
- implementation status
- testing status
- version info (eg first created in QL v?)
- Related functions
- Possibly a ChangeLog ?
- Translations ?
- Keywords/Categories to classify function
- Samples/Examples
- Related functions
I agree with everything but translations. Not that we have to forbid them,
but imho the financial community doesn't really need them.
Eric wrote:
I'll send more specific comments on Monday,
as well as a split QuEP11(/12?) and a draft
design for the automatic generation of code
I look forward to it.
ciao -- Nando
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]