Re: Adding function through functions.c

[Vlad Anuchin <vlad anuchin gmail com>]

On Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:36:44 -0600
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow pyrshep ca> wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:58 +0200, Jean Bréfort wrote:
> > Which gnumeric version are you using? The third field in
> > GnmFuncDescriptor disappeared at some point in 1.9.x
>
> (at some point == this past Friday)
>
> > You might also check that the plugin has been correctly installed
> > and is loaded.
>
> > Le dimanche 16 août 2009 à 13:03 +0200, Vlad Anuchin a écrit :
> > > Hi 
> > >
> > > I'm trying to add a function 'pee()' to Gnumeric in functions.c
> > > under fn-math So far:
> > > 1) Created both: 'static GnmFuncHelp const help_pee' and static
> > > 'GnmValue * gnumeric_pee' (copies of pi() implementation) 2) Added
> > > { "pee",      "", "",           help_pee, gnumeric_pee, NULL,
> > > NULL, NULL, NULL, GNM_FUNC_SIMPLE, GNM_FUNC_IMPL_STATUS_COMPLETE,
> > > GNM_FUNC_TEST_STATUS_EXHAUSTIVE } in 'GnmFuncDescriptor const
> > > math_functions[]' 3) Added '<function name="pee"/>' in plugin.xml
> > > and plugin.xml.in
>
> Normally you shouldn't touch plugin.xml, it is created from
> plugin.xml.in
>
> > > Yet, in Gnumeric on '=pee()' '#NAME' is the response. What am I
> > > missing?
>
> It doesn't sound like anything is missing.
>
> If you send me your functions.c and  plugin.xml.in I can take a look.
>
> Andreas
> > >

Version 1.8.4
Ubuntu 9.04
Anjuta 2.26

Could it be that I'm not testing it correctly by running it in Anjuta?

Attachment: plugin.xml.in
Description: Binary data

Attachment: functions.c
Description: Text Data