Re: g_connect_signal events. underscore vs dash
- From: "Tristan Van Berkom" <tvb gnome org>
- To: "Gregory Hosler" <ghosler redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-app-devel-list <gtk-app-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: g_connect_signal events. underscore vs dash
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:21:03 -0300
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Gregory Hosler <ghosler redhat com> wrote:
[...]
I have some old code, that in many places is using underscores instead of dashes. e.g.
"button_release_event"; in fact I have cases where the same signal is g_connect'ed in
different places in the code, one place with underscores ("button_release_event") and the
other place with dashes ("button-release-event").
My question: Is one preferred over the other ? is the underscore deprecated ? What's the
best spelling to use ?
They are synonymous, but afaik they are all defined as dashes,
generally I always use dashes.
One slightly relevent thing though, when dealing with the GObject
"notify" signal, the
dash and underscore are not synonymous for the property names
(i.e. "notify::button-style" is not synonymous with "notify::button_style")
Through normal property accessors; dashes and underscores are also synonymous,
i.e. g_object_get (object, "button-style", &style, NULL) is the same as
g_object_get (object, "button_style", &style, NULL).
I believe the only exception here really is the signal detail
arguments that depict
property names.
Cheers,
-Tristan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]