Re[2]: argv



You should be aware of how unimpressive a performance you're putting on. By your own account you have a mistaken notion of where in memory your program's argument array is to be found. But apparently you are lacking one or more of the curiosity, the initiative or the intellectual firepower to actually investigate and solve this problem. Instead you embark on endless rounds of self-justification and slagging-off of those who are trying to help you.

Into the bargain, you tell us "Farewell" half-a-dozen postings ago then continue right on with more of the same. One of those people for whom "farewell" is really just a bid for yet more attention.

Allin Cottrell


On Sat, 16 Apr 2016, Andrew Robinson wrote:

Your replies are an example of exactly what I am talking about here regarding
support from the Linux community. Look at the huge number of things you got
blatantly wrong so far [etc.]


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]