Re: --g-fatal-warnings

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On Mon, 17 Aug 1998, Tim Janik wrote:

> hi all,
> 
> after Glib supporting different log levels and domains now,
> gtk gained a few more options to specify fatal warnings.
> glib logs g_warning() with G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING, g_error()
> with G_LOG_LEVEL_ERROR, and g_return*_if_fail() with
> G_LOG_LEVEL_CRITICAL, since the latter is different from
> a normal warning in that it actually causes abortion of
> certain functions.
> 
> gtk_init() currently features:
> --g-fatal-warnings   for abortion on g_warning in GLib
> --gdk-fatal-warnings for abortion on g_warning in GDK
> --gtk-fatal-warnings for abortion on g_warning in GTK+
> --g-fatal-checks     for abortion on g_return*_if_fail in GLib
> --gdk-fatal-checks   for abortion on g_return*_if_fail in GDK
> --gtk-fatal-checks   for abortion on g_return*_if_fail in GTK+
> 
> i'd like that to reduce to either
> 
> --gtk-fatal-warnings for abortion on g_warning in GTK+/GDK/GLib/GModule
> --gtk-fatal-checks   for abortion on g_return*_if_fail in GTK+/GDK/GLib/GModule
> 
> or
> 
> --gtk-fatal-checks   for abortion on g_return*_if_fail and g_warning in
>                      GTK+/GDK/GLib/GModule

ok, i'm going to take the latter suggestion if no one objects
(prior to the upcoming release on tuesday night).

> 
> what are peoples opinions on this issue?
> 

not too late to raise voices! ;)

> 
> ---
> ciaoTJ
> 

---
ciaoTJ