Re: g_snprintf() implementation

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On Sun, 18 Apr 1999, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> g_snprintf() has two possible implementations, one which uses vsnprintf()
> and one which doesn't. Only the one which doesn't does this:
> str[n-1] = '\0';
> 
> According to the man page, vsnprintf() does *not* do this, since it
> behaves just like regular snprintf(). The other problem is that
> vsnprintf() potentially returns -1, but the other implementation does not.
> 
> I think the vsnprintf() version should be changed to null-terminate and
> never return -1.
> Am I missing something?

nope, you're absolutely right, please make the appropriate change.

> 
> Havoc
> 

---
ciaoTJ