Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- From: Guillaume Laurent <glaurent worldnet fr>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: New 'GObject' as base for GtkObject?
- Date: 11 Dec 1999 01:34:47 +0100
Tim Janik <timj@gtk.org> writes:
> i don't know how you handle GtkItemFactoryEntry in C++,
We don't. GtkItemFactory has been removed from Gtk-- in favor of a
better API for Gtk_MenuItem.
> C++ is actually the one language that should have the least headaches
> with the provided C interfaces.
There are two problems cause by such structures as
GtkItemFactoryEntry:
- They are used in arrays, we'd rather have vectors (though that's not
such a big deal - lists are more problematic).
- as I pointed out earlier, they assume the callback can only be a
function pointer. So what happens is that we have to make the signal
connection once the widget is created, which isn't an always easy
process.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.worldnet.fr/~glaurent
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]