Policy for gdk changes?
- From: Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Policy for gdk changes?
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:09:30 +0000 (GMT)
Paolo Molaro writes:
> Well, now we have the win32 port in the source:
It isn't there "officially" or even in whole, yet, but just on yosh's
and Tim Janik's request, to help discussing the kind of questions you
ask.
> In the win32 dir there are 3 header files:
> gdk.h, gdktypes.h and gdkprivate.h. I think the changes in
> the first two are very little, so it's better to merge the changes
> with #ifdef/#endif in the gdk/ directory.
That was my thoughts, too.
> Different implementations (the .c files) are fine in their own
> directory.
Moving the X11 implementation to a separate gdk/x11 (or gdk/X11?)
directory without losing the CVS history of the files apparently
requires some CVS hackery, but I think that would indeed be the most
logical way. The backend-independent header files could stay in the
gdk directory.
> Are the porters required to
> read the commit mailing-list and keep up,
I don't think that's reasonable, the GNOME cvs-commits-list is such
high volume. Perhaps there could be separate lists for glib, gtk+ and
gimp?
> A message to this mailing-list could be enough, but I don't know
> if it would be fair to the porters.
It would be enough for me, at least.
--tml
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]