Re: New objects for GLib



Hi Soeren,

<< Why USYNC_PROCESS instead of USYNC_THREAD >>

> Do GLib mutexes have to be able to synchronize threads in different
> processes? 

Ok, that indeed is a flaw (maybe not a bug though). Fixed in CVS (at least for
1.3, I've no intention to fix that for 1.2)

> > /* Compile with latest CVS Glib: e.g.
> >
> >       gcc -I. -o queue-compare queue-compare.c .libs/libglib.a \
> >          gthread/.libs/libgthread.a -lpthread
> 
> The CVS version of GLib was unable to find out that it must use
> -lpthread on Irix. It seems pthread_create is available without
> -lpthread while the other pthread functions are not.

Here is another patch for that, could you please try it on IRIX? I could that
commit that patch. It at least still works for Linux ans Solaris.

Thanks,
Sebastian
-- 
Sebastian Wilhelmi                   |            här ovanför alla molnen
mailto:wilhelmi@ira.uka.de           |     är himmlen så förunderligt blå
http://goethe.ira.uka.de/~wilhelmi   |




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]