Re: Consensus on getter conventions?
- From: Vlad Harchev <hvv hippo ru>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Consensus on getter conventions?
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:12:53 +0500 (SAMST)
On 24 Aug 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
> If this goes in I'd like to see G_CONST rather than gconst since I
> would understand this to be a preprocessor-time configuration thing
> like G_GNUC_PRINTF. Also I've seen other packages that use uppercase
> CONST for this (Tcl/Tk I believe).
Why it must be a preprocessor define?
Also, it's much more difficult to type uppercased letters than lowercased.
Also, we may use 'cgchar' instead of 'gconst gchar' in order to save more
typing.
> Havoc
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
Best regards,
-Vlad
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]