Re: Consensus on getter conventions?
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Dan Winship <danw helixcode com>,Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>,Owen Taylor <otaylor gtk org>
- Subject: Re: Consensus on getter conventions?
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 09:36:00 +0200 (CEST)
On 24 Aug 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If this goes in I'd like to see G_CONST rather than gconst since I
> would understand this to be a preprocessor-time configuration thing
> like G_GNUC_PRINTF. Also I've seen other packages that use uppercase
> CONST for this (Tcl/Tk I believe).
right, i meant to poitn that out as well.
though i wouldn't be immensly opposed to using GCONST instead of
G_CONST, since we already use that for pointer/int type conversions
and it simply looks less cluttered.
remark for owen, it'd also come closer to gconstpointer ;)
>
> Havoc
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]