Re: gerror.c revisited
- From: Darin Adler <darin eazel com>
- To: <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gerror.c revisited
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:06:13 -0700
on 8/31/00 9:14 AM, Owen Taylor at otaylor@redhat.com wrote:
>> + g_error ("%s, %d, %s.\n", err->domain, err->code, err->message);
Incredibly tiny nit pick. g_error adds its own "\n", it's a mistake to add
another.
> g_warning ("%s\n", err->message);
> exit(1);
Same for g_warning.
> (We should really add g_fatal() that prints a message and does exit(1)
> without the abort).
I wholeheartedly agree. I think many uses of g_error are actually candidates
for g_fatal. The latter would be for errors with a runtime cause rather than
programmer errors.
Of course the names still don't make clear which is appropriate to use when.
-- Darin
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]