Re: Glib rand() revisited: RAND_MAX?

From: Derek Simkowiak <dereks kd-dev com>
To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
Subject: Re: Glib rand() revisited: RAND_MAX?
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:05:31 -0800 (PST)

> This convertion exists, because RAND_MAX is not 2^32-1 everywhere whereas the
> maximum of g_rand_int is 2^32-1 everywhere.

     Sebastian,
	Thank you for explaining this to me.

	I agree that G_RAND_MAX is neither necessary nor called for.


--Derek

References:
- Re: Glib rand() revisited: RAND_MAX?
  - From: Sebastian Wilhelmi

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]