Re: GtkPaned vs. GtkBox
- From: Fritz Jetzek <fritz jetzek i-dmedia com>
- To: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- CC: kenelson sequoia ece ucdavis edu
- Subject: Re: GtkPaned vs. GtkBox
- Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 23:13:12 +0100
Karl Nelson wrote:
>
> Can I suggest an alternate design? Rather than trying to
> turn a box into a paned, we could just create a special
> type of separater. This would be a PanedSeparator. You
> could place in inside any Box and thus change the widgets
> on either side to act like panes. Thus if you want to have
> a paned set up like say xfontsel, you make a Vbox with a menubar,
> then a button bar, a PanedSeparator, a label, a PanedSeparator,
> then a drawing area.
>
> -------------------
> | Menu |
> +-------------------+
> | Buttons |
> +-----------------O-+ PanedSeparator
> | Label |
> +-----------------O-+ PanedSeparator
> | |
> | Drawing area |
> |___________________|
>
> This would give the same effect as creating a mult-paned which
> you desire and remove the need to a special Paned with 2 areas.
> (Could be made backwards compatible with some wrapping code.)
>
> (It would be really cool if the PanedSeparator could be made
> to work with tables as well, but not necessary.)
>
> What do you think?
>
> --Karl
>
>
makes much more sense than my suggestion imho - i have no idea how
difficult it would be to implement a standalone PanedSeparator since i
haven't looked into the code of GtkBox and GtkPaned but i'll definitely
do so soon and come up with something. i might be more efficient if the
guy who already made GtkPaned could do that, but i'm aware that i
triggered the discussion so i'll allocate some time to that thing ;)
fritz
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]