[volunteers] small LGPL project
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: [volunteers] small LGPL project
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:18:58 +0200 (CEST)
> Also, Pango's COPYING file contains the LGPL 2, while the README
> says the license is LGPL 2.1 (the Library or Lesser GPL 2.1).
which reminds me.
the glib and gtk+ sources currently contain (in most places at least):
[...]
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Library General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public
* License along with this library; if not, write to the
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
* Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*/
/*
* Modified by the GTK+ Team and others 1997-1999. See the AUTHORS
* file for a list of people on the GTK+ Team. See the ChangeLog
* files for a list of changes. These files are distributed with
* GTK+ at ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/.
*/
[...]
this needs to be changed to:
[...]
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General
* Public License along with this library; if not, write to the
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330,
* Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
*/
/* Modified by the GTK+ Team and others 1997-2000. See the AUTHORS
* file for a list of people on the GTK+ Team. See the ChangeLog
* files for a list of changes. These files are distributed with
* GTK+ at ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/.
*/
[...]
i.e. Library GPL -> Lesser GPL and s/1997-1999/1997-2000/
this has to be changed somewhen before the 2.0 release. if some kind
soul would volunteer for this task and send a patch agains cvs HEAD,
that'd greatly be apprechiated.
in case someone actually tackles this issue:
- take it as a perl contest challenge, some files are formatted more
equally than others ;)
- please provide a patch *only* covering the license issue, i don't want
to dig into CList or GtkSpinButton code upon review
- send it to me privately, i doubt the majority of gtk-devel will want to
review a multiple thousand lines licensing patch
- do a cvs diff -u, i don't have the apropriate set of glasses to read
non-unified diffs
- if you are unsure about how to patch a file, maybe 'cause it's currently
lacking a license or whatever, simply compile a list of those files
so we can fix them later. this is _way_ easier than backing out
patch portions
- duplicate work, that is, if you receive reliable information your
neighbour is starting out on this, try to beat him time-wise ;)
- if you're too lazy for this undertaking, take a private minute and
giggle at me for being naive enough to try to find a volunteer
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]