Re: gunicode.h
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: gunicode.h
- Date: 12 Jun 2000 15:22:30 -0400
Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com> writes:
> gunichar g_utf8_get_char (gchar *iter);
> gchar * g_utf8_iter_from_index (const gchar *str,
> gint index);
> gint g_utf8_iter_to_index (const gchar *str,
> const gchar *pos);
I think the use of "iter" is cryptic here, I like "pointer" more
i.e. g_utf8_pointer_from_index() g_utf8_pointer_to_index().
> gchar * g_utf8_next_char (gchar *iter);
> gchar * g_utf8_prev_char (gchar *iter);
These args should be const if "pos" above is const, right?
> gchar * g_utf8_find_next_char (gchar *iter,
> const gchar *bound);
> gchar * g_utf8_find_prev_char (const gchar *str,
> gchar *iter);
>
Why is bound const but not iter?
> /* Copies n characters from src to dest */
> gchar *g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,
> const gchar *src,
> size_t n);
>
Use of size_t here seems weird since size_t is almost always used to
count bytes. I would think just int, there's no sense in which this n
is a memory offset or size.
> gunichar2 *g_utf8_to_ucs2 (const char *str,
> gint len);
> gunichar *g_utf8_to_ucs4 (const char *str,
> int len);
>
Include the inverse of these, maybe? (g_ucs4_to_utf8() etc.)
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]