Re: gunicode.h

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Dan Winship <danw@helixcode.com> writes:

> > gint g_unichar_isalnum   (gunichar c);
> 
> Shouldn't these be gboolean?
 
Yes, thanks.
 
> You should wrap the unicode_iconv routines too, for OSes that don't
> have them.

It was decided that we would require an iconv, rather than including
one. If your system doesn't have one, or doesn't have a good enough
one, we'll recommend libiconv.

The world does not need another set of charset conversion tables.

So, we won't wrap iconv itself (or at most with a simple #define g_iconv iconv),
though, as I mentioned in my last mail, I do want an easy-to-use
wrapper, since iconv is very much not easy to use.

Regards,
                                        Owen