Re: GError

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Owen Taylor <otaylor@redhat.com> writes:

> I went back and read through the GException thread:
> 
>  http://mail.gnome.org/pipermail/gtk-devel-list/2000-February/002595.html
> 
> As well as the head article, see in particular Havoc's summary in:
> 
>  http://mail.gnome.org/pipermail/gtk-devel-list/2000-February/002617.html
> 
> 
> Out of the four possible schemes described in summary, I think the 
> reasonable ones are #1 and #4. (Havoc's original proposal and 
> return code + error object.) 

As was was pointed out, Havoc's original proposal was #2, not #1.

Sorry for the confusion,
                                        Owen