Re: GTK+ Future timelines and features, help needed ???
- From: Bryan Patrick Coleman <bpcolema uncg edu>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Future timelines and features, help needed ???
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 14:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Dean Jones wrote:
>how this overlaps with the GNOME toolkits (like the GnomeCanvas issue),
I like gtk+ better than the gnome stuff which does not seem to add that
much to me.
>the Bonobo object model, GtkExtra stuff. What the toolkit can do,
I thought Bonobo was a python thing.
>can't do, and can do better. I am not quite sure if I would best
>fit at the GTK+ layer, or GNOME toolkit layer/Bonobo stuff. If I knew
>the plans of where GTK+ was going, I could start picking things to
>start hacking on. And interesting issue would br GTK+ feature parity
>with Qt, if it is not already ahead... ;-)
>
This would help. I would like to see all open source progect adopt a
better defined lifecycle and requirments model.
- Bryan Patrick Coleman
UNCG
bpcolema@uncg.edu
http://www.uncg.edu/~bpcolema
Octagram Linux
octagram@excite.com
http://octagram.sourceforge.net
Questcon
bcoleman@questcon.com
http://www.questcon.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]