Re: GList and GSList data abstraction

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Kevin Lai <laik@tnt.stanford.edu> writes:
> I also agree that allowing an error like that is a bad idea. The other 
> abstraction macros also allowed it, so I changed them in the included 
> updated patch too.
> 
> Any thoughts on removing (or at least deprecating) redundant functions 
> like g_list_nth_data(), g_list_free_1(), g_list_remove(), and 
> g_list_delete_link()?
> 

Both changes could break existing applications, with no really
compelling reason to do so.

Havoc