Re: GNOME CVS: glib martin

[Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>]

otaylor fresnel labs redhat com writes:

> To see why this is wrong, first consider the differnce between 
> --disable-threads and --without-threads
> 
>  --disable-threads: Completely omit all thread locks
>  --without-threads: Do not use the system implementation of threads
>                     but put in the thread locks, and allow an
>                     implementation of the locks to be supplied at
>                     g_thread_init() time.
> 
> So, as long as the user has not disabled thread support with
> --disable-threads, we need -lgthread so that g_thread_init()
> is provided.

Hmm, the best way to fix this mess is probably if I just revert my
changes and then try to find out what was going wrong with the gthread
compilation.

-- 
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)