Re: GNOME CVS: glib martin
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME CVS: glib martin
- Date: 04 Oct 2000 11:22:29 +0200
Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> On 3 Oct 2000, Martin Baulig wrote:
>
> > otaylor fresnel labs redhat com writes:
> >
> > > To see why this is wrong, first consider the differnce between
> > > --disable-threads and --without-threads
> > >
> > > --disable-threads: Completely omit all thread locks
> > > --without-threads: Do not use the system implementation of threads
> > > but put in the thread locks, and allow an
> > > implementation of the locks to be supplied at
> > > g_thread_init() time.
> > >
> > > So, as long as the user has not disabled thread support with
> > > --disable-threads, we need -lgthread so that g_thread_init()
> > > is provided.
> >
> > Hmm, the best way to fix this mess is probably if I just revert my
> > changes and then try to find out what was going wrong with the gthread
> > compilation.
>
> that'd be apprechiated.
Ok, reverted.
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]