Re: glib outstanding stuff

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On 6 Oct 2000, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> 
> Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes: 
> > i don't have a strong opinion on whether we should have a function
> > for the "any" or "all" tests, but i find the name g_file_test()
> > annoyingly unintuitive to perform an "any" test.
> > judging from the name, "g_file_test" should do an "all" test,
> > if you want it match any GFileTest bit, call it "g_file_test_any".
> >
> 
> Just _test() doesn't imply any or all to me. test_any seems pretty
> cryptic though. Any better ideas? Anyone?

it does for me, from glibc, kernel or assembler "*test" functions.

> 
> Havoc
> 

---
ciaoTJ