Re: Gtk Rtl patch
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Robert Brady <robert suse co uk>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gtk Rtl patch
- Date: 21 Oct 2000 22:40:39 -0400
Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
> Robert Brady <robert suse co uk> writes:
> > Argh. So it does. How does this sound -
> > add guint flippable : 1; to GtkRange, initialise this to 0 in
> > gtk_range_new, have the flipping be conditional on this, and have
> > GtkHScale's _new set it to 1.
> >
>
> A class variable would be cleaner, but isn't language-bindable, so
> maybe a virtual method flippable() with a default implementation that
> returns FALSE?
I think, in this case, the class variable is probably OK, since
I don't see deriving new types from GtkRange as very useful -
it would basically be an implementation detail, and that
would be fine to be C-specific.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]