Re: GObject and Gtk+ Finalization
- From: George <jirka 5z com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GObject and Gtk+ Finalization
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:59:34 -0700
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > > You just removed the count owned by pass_object_to_owner(). The
> > > floating count remains, but can be removed at any time.
> >
> > Yes, with an unref
>
> No you can't remove the floating count with unref. Period. Those are
> the rules dude. ;-)
/me bangs head against wall
yes you can. Fuck rules, read code :)
Anyway, moot point. I know your argument, all I'm saying is that while
it may not be right (you say so, I don't) it DOES work.
My point is. IF code doesn't sink in init, things still work if you only use
ref/unref. That is, you NEVER call sink. If it's correct or not, who cares.
It DOES work.
/me bangs Havocs head against wall a bit for good meassure
Anyway ... I do ref/sink in such objects in my code. And it was not my
argument. However my code worked perfectly before I did this, because I
wasn't sinking anything anywhere.
George
--
George <jirka 5z com>
The great masses of the people ... will more easily
fall victims to a big lie than to a small one.
-- Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf", 1933
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]