Re: small configure.in patch
- From: Erwann Chenede <Erwann Chenede Sun COM>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: otaylor redhat com
- Subject: Re: small configure.in patch
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:44:57 +0100 (BST)
[....]
>
>I don't think this is quite right - in fact, the intent of the
>GTK+ configure.in is that $(LIBS) is never used at all, since
>we have all sorts of different libraries that might be needed.
>
>What is the particular link error you are seeing?
>
> Owen
That's strange, here it is the link error I'm getting without my patch :
[...]
gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -I/export/home/multihead/install/include/glib-2.0
-I/export/home/multihead/install/lib/glib-2.0/include -o
.libs/make-inline-pixbuf make-inline-pixbuf.o .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-1.3.so
-L/export/home/multihead/install/lib -lgobject-1.3 -lgmodule-1.3 -ldl -lglib-1.3
-liconv -L/export/home/multihead/install/lib -lgobject-1.3 -lgmodule-1.3 -ldl
-lglib-1.3 -liconv -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -R/export/home/multihead/install/lib
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
log /opt/gnome/lib/libtiff.so
ceil .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-1.3.so
pow /opt/gnome/lib/libtiff.so
sqrt /opt/gnome/lib/libtiff.so
floor .libs/libgdk_pixbuf-1.3.so
exp /opt/gnome/lib/libtiff.so
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to
.libs/make-inline-pixbuf
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
[...]
If I apply that change it the -lm is included and the linker doesn't
complain anymore.
So if this is not the right place to modify to get -lm included
could you tell me were should I look ?
Thanks,
Erwann
[ I speak for myself, not for my employer. ]
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Erwann Chénedé, Sun Microsystems Ireland
Desktop Applications & Middleware Group
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]