Re: gdk_pixbuf and comments ?
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gdk_pixbuf and comments ?
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 03:56:02 +0200 (CEST)
On 6 Aug 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> writes:
>
> > I think one way we discussed doing this was similar to the properties
> > passed to gdk_pixbuf_save() - there would be loader-specific named
> > fields you could retrieve from images.
> >
> > Something like:
> > gchar *comment = gdk_pixbuf_get_extra_field (pixbuf, "comment");
> >
> > Then it's a bit more extensible. That seems a bit lame though, we may
> > have had the details hashed out a bit better in the past.
>
> I would prefer a cleaner API, but I wouldn't object to this solution. We
> could then define a small set of common property names for standard
> stuff like comment, gamma, resolution as we do in GIMP for parasites.
> I'll have a look at the gdk-pixbuf-save() implementation...
i'd agree that just supporting comments feels cleaner.
in general, one can't set different types of parasites on images,
so i find an API indicating so misleading.
>
> Salut, Sven
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]