Re: Outstanding GIOChannel issues
- From: Hans Breuer <hans breuer org>
- To: Ron Steinke <rsteinke w-link net>
- Cc: otaylor redhat com, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Outstanding GIOChannel issues
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 21:50:49 +0200
At 13:48 05.08.01 -0700, Ron Steinke wrote:
>From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
>> Ron Steinke <rsteinke w-link net> writes:
>>
>> > The implementation of the new GIOChannel API for 2.0 is mostly
complete, but
>> > there are a few outstanding issues I'd like some comments on:
>> >
>> > * win32 implmentation:
>> >
It worries me as well, especially because I didn't get any response to
my mail "Re: g_io_channel_win32_new_fd() and is_*able"
>> > ...
>> >
>> > The problem in this area that worries me is that we haven't made
up our
>> > minds how to handle O_BINARY (bug 57695). Ideas? Opinions? Anyone?
>>
>> Let's:
>>
>> * Always specify O_BINARY on platforms where it matters
>
>The win32 people will need to include this in g_io_channel_new_file (),
>then. Win32 people, any opinions? Does anyone care?
>
Probably the right way to go. If i recall correctly otherwise seek would
fail as a bonus ...
>> [...]
Hans
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to
get along without it. -- Dilbert
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]