[patch] gdk-pixbuf optimizations
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: [patch] gdk-pixbuf optimizations
- Date: 08 Aug 2001 11:34:33 +0200
Hi,
here's a patch that applies some simple optimizations to the
compositing functions used in gdk-pixbuf. I have benchmarked
pixbuf-demo and even though my benchmark did include some
expensive calculations inside pixbuf-demo itself, the changes
resulted in a speedup of 29%. For the pretty often used case
that overall_alpha is 255, compositing speed went up by 47%.
There's still room for more optimizations, but I didn't want
to make the code totally unreadable. Would be nice if someone
could look over the patch and check that I didn't screw things
up.
Salut, Sven
Index: pixops/pixops.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/gdk-pixbuf/pixops/pixops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.17 pixops.c
--- pixops/pixops.c 2001/07/18 04:25:04 1.17
+++ pixops/pixops.c 2001/08/08 09:25:18
@@ -176,37 +176,37 @@
else
a0 = overall_alpha;
- if (dest_has_alpha)
- {
- unsigned int w0 = 0xff * a0;
- unsigned int w1 = (0xff - a0) * dest[3];
- unsigned int w = w0 + w1;
+ switch (a0)
+ {
+ case 0:
+ break;
+ case 255:
+ memcpy (dest, p, 3);
+ if (dest_has_alpha)
+ dest[3] = 0xff;
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (dest_has_alpha)
+ {
+ unsigned int w0 = 0xff * a0;
+ unsigned int w1 = (0xff - a0) * dest[3];
+ unsigned int w = w0 + w1;
- if (w != 0)
- {
dest[0] = (w0 * p[0] + w1 * dest[0]) / w;
dest[1] = (w0 * p[1] + w1 * dest[1]) / w;
dest[2] = (w0 * p[2] + w1 * dest[2]) / w;
dest[3] = w / 0xff;
- }
- else
- {
- dest[0] = 0;
- dest[1] = 0;
- dest[2] = 0;
- dest[3] = 0;
- }
- }
- else
- {
- dest[0] = (a0 * p[0] + (0xff - a0) * dest[0]) / 0xff;
- dest[1] = (a0 * p[1] + (0xff - a0) * dest[1]) / 0xff;
- dest[2] = (a0 * p[2] + (0xff - a0) * dest[2]) / 0xff;
-
- if (dest_channels == 4)
- dest[3] = 0xff;
- }
-
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ unsigned int a1 = 0xff - a0;
+
+ dest[0] = (a0 * p[0] + a1 * dest[0]) / 0xff;
+ dest[1] = (a0 * p[1] + a1 * dest[1]) / 0xff;
+ dest[2] = (a0 * p[2] + a1 * dest[2]) / 0xff;
+ }
+ break;
+ }
dest += dest_channels;
x += x_step;
}
@@ -283,31 +283,48 @@
else
a0 = overall_alpha;
- if (a0 == 255)
- {
+ switch (a0)
+ {
+ case 0:
+ if (((j + check_x) >> check_shift) & 1)
+ {
+ dest[0] = r2;
+ dest[1] = g2;
+ dest[2] = b2;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ dest[0] = r1;
+ dest[1] = g1;
+ dest[2] = b1;
+ }
+ break;
+ case 255:
dest[0] = p[0];
dest[1] = p[1];
dest[2] = p[2];
- }
- else
- if (((j + check_x) >> check_shift) & 1)
- {
- tmp = ((int) p[0] - r2) * a0;
- dest[0] = r2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- tmp = ((int) p[1] - g2) * a0;
- dest[1] = g2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- tmp = ((int) p[2] - b2) * a0;
- dest[2] = b2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- }
- else
- {
- tmp = ((int) p[0] - r1) * a0;
- dest[0] = r1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- tmp = ((int) p[1] - g1) * a0;
- dest[1] = g1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- tmp = ((int) p[2] - b1) * a0;
- dest[2] = b1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
- }
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (((j + check_x) >> check_shift) & 1)
+ {
+ tmp = ((int) p[0] - r2) * a0;
+ dest[0] = r2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ tmp = ((int) p[1] - g2) * a0;
+ dest[1] = g2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ tmp = ((int) p[2] - b2) * a0;
+ dest[2] = b2 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ tmp = ((int) p[0] - r1) * a0;
+ dest[0] = r1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ tmp = ((int) p[1] - g1) * a0;
+ dest[1] = g1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ tmp = ((int) p[2] - b1) * a0;
+ dest[2] = b1 + ((tmp + (tmp >> 8) + 0x80) >> 8);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
if (dest_channels == 4)
dest[3] = 0xff;
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]