Re: glib object orientation

[Eduardo Pérez Ureta <eperez dei inf uc3m es>]

On 2001-08-11 01:22:34 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Eduardo Pérez Ureta <eperez dei inf uc3m es> writes:
> 
> > Why do you name (and other people) functions like:
> > g_nullify_pointer()
> > instead the OO naming:
> > g_pointer_nullify()
> 
> hmm, everyone agreed on this one since noone objected.
>  
> > glib is supposed to be as OO as possible including its namespace, isn't it ?
> 
> I don't think this holds true for pure glib. But please move this
> discussion on the gtk-devel list...

As Sven stated, What's the current policy for the namespace of glib ?