Re: PATCH: add second argument to GWeakNotify



On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, James Henstridge wrote:

> Here is a patch that adds the second argument to the weak reference
> notifier prototype, as discussed on the list.
> 
> The patch adds the object pointer as the second argument, rather than
> first in order to keep compatibility.  I didn't hide the second argument,
> as Tim suggested, as it feels a bit messy (IMHO).  The final argument
> order and whether the GObject* argument is shown in the headers are up to
> Tim and Owen though.
> 
> Is it okay to check this in?

as far as i'm concerned, you can commit this if you stay with
typedef void (*GWeakNotify)            (gpointer      data);
for the public API and just add the object internally.
this patch requires doc updates also though.

> 
> James.
> 

---
ciaoTJ





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]