Re: GSignal documentation
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Joshua N Pritikin <vishnu pobox com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GSignal documentation
- Date: 19 Aug 2001 11:16:45 -0400
Joshua N Pritikin <vishnu pobox com> writes:
> Everything is fine, except that the name `instance' is too generic. It's
> really a `scope_instance' -- since everything that connects to a signal's
> scope receives emissions. Contrary to the documentation, i feel like the
> signal system doesn't have much to do with objects. Rather it bridges
> scopes and pierces abstraction layers -- i think of it as a run-time
> scope system.
What is a "signal's scope"? I don't understand how you are using
"scope" here.
Signals can be on any instance of a type. Types don't have to be
GObjects. (This is a bit silly IMO, but that's how it is.) The
"instance" here is simply the object emitting the signal.
"itype" = instance_type or interface_type I assume.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]