Re: gobject profile ... (fwd)
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, alexl redhat com
- Subject: Re: gobject profile ... (fwd)
- Date: 24 Aug 2001 18:50:18 -0400
Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> On 24 Aug 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> >
> > Michael Meeks <michael ximian com> writes:
> >
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > This may or may not be appreciated - but, I'm profiling test-ui in
> > > a nice tight loop doing 1000 batched sets; to see if any obvious
> > > bottlenecks come out ( with CVS HEAD libbonoboui/test/test-ui and
> > > eazel-tools/prof/prof incidentaly ):
> >
> > Oh for decent profiling tools.... this sort of information is useful,
> > but without call graphs not that useful. I'd really like to be able
> > to see _where_ all the lock/unlock action was coming from.
>
> well, grepping for static_rw on the profile i posted an excerpt from earlier,
> (before merging):
Hmmm...
> Percentage | Total | Average | # Calls | Function | Caller
> 5.457186910 | 7.891597889 | 0.000055861 | 141272 | g_static_rw_lock_reader_lock | g_type_is_a
> 0.107371600 | 0.155269281 | 0.000001099 | 141272 | g_static_rw_lock_reader_unlock | g_type_is_a
> 0.241135842 | 0.348704769 | 0.000000760 | 458668 | g_static_rw_lock_reader_lock | g_type_check_instance_cast
> 0.315551063 | 0.456316073 | 0.000000995 | 458668 | g_static_rw_lock_reader_unlock | g_type_check_instance_cast
'# calls' numbers look right, the time/percentage parts look just a bit funny....
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]