Re: Fwd: Re: URIs vs. half-baked URIs [glib PATCH]

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 08:00:13AM -0600, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On August 24, 2001 03:36 pm, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >   Well I misread that part.
> >   However using file:///path is I think a better practice than
> > file:/path . Though file:/path is a hierachical URI per the RFC 2396
> > the RFC 1738 defining the file scheme in section 3.10 explictely say
> 
> RFC 2396 revises and replaces both RFC's 1738 and 1808, so why would you 
> choose to follow 1738 and ignore 2396? and 2396 is really not that new either 
> (Aug '98)