Re: Questioning non-NULL boxed types
- From: Martin Baulig <martin home-of-linux org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>, Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, gnome-components-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questioning non-NULL boxed types
- Date: 28 Aug 2001 10:38:51 +0200
Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:
> One thing that possibly needs to be taken into account here is that libbonobo
> actually does use boxed_init functions for two types:
>
> type = g_boxed_type_register_static ("BonoboCorbaAny", corba_any_init,
> corba_any_copy, corba_any_free, TRUE);
>
> type = g_boxed_type_register_static ("BonoboCorbaException", corba_exception_init,
> corba_exception_copy, corba_exception_free, TRUE);
They're mainly there because I assumed that "boxed types must have an init function".
--
Martin Baulig
martin gnome org (private)
baulig suse de (work)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]