typo in genums.h ?!
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: typo in genums.h ?!
- Date: 08 Jan 2001 17:44:16 +0100
Hi,
i have the impression gobject/genums.h from CVS contains a typo.
I propose to apply the following patch:
diff -u -r1.5 genums.h
--- gobject/genums.h 2000/10/25 20:36:35 1.5
+++ gobject/genums.h 2001/01/08 16:31:33
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
#define G_ENUM_CLASS(class) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_CAST ((class), G_TYPE_ENUM, GEnumClass))
#define G_IS_ENUM_CLASS(class) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_TYPE ((class), G_TYPE_ENUM))
#define G_ENUM_CLASS_TYPE(class) (G_TYPE_FROM_CLASS (class))
-#define G_ENUM_CLASS_TYPE_NAME(class) (g_type_name (G_ENUM_TYPE (class)))
+#define G_ENUM_CLASS_TYPE_NAME(class) (g_type_name (G_ENUM_CLASS_TYPE (class)))
#define G_TYPE_IS_FLAGS(type) (G_TYPE_FUNDAMENTAL (type) == G_TYPE_FLAGS)
#define G_FLAGS_CLASS(class) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_CAST ((class), G_TYPE_FLAGS, GFlagsClass))
#define G_IS_FLAGS_CLASS(class) (G_TYPE_CHECK_CLASS_TYPE ((class), G_TYPE_FLAGS))
However I have not yet figured out how to access the enum registered with an
object. My code is using
container_policy_type =
g_enum_register_static ("GCimContainerPolicy",
g_cim_container_policy_enum_values);
and installs the enum as property during class initialization:
param_spec = g_param_spec_enum ("policy", NULL, NULL,
G_CIM_TYPE_CONTAINER_POLICY,
G_CIM_CONTAINER_POLICY_STRONG,
G_PARAM_READABLE |
G_PARAM_WRITABLE |
G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY);
g_object_class_install_property (object_class,
PROP_POLICY, param_spec);
Now, how do I access the name of an enum_value later? At the moment I try
the following. After retrieving the property_spec from the class, I do:
g_value_init (value, prop_spec->value_type);
g_object_get_property (G_OBJECT (object), prop_name, value);
This appereantly works fine. Then I try to find the string representation of
the enum_value set:
GEnumValue *enum_value = g_enum_get_value (G_ENUM_CLASS (value),
g_value_get_enum (value));
name = enum_value->value_name;
but g_enum_get_value() fails here. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here?
Salut, Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]