Re: plea for review
- From: Alexander Larsson <alla lysator liu se>
- To: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: plea for review
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 15:53:38 +0100 (CET)
Before starting to review the actual locking i'd like to state that the
following locking primitive is completely bogus:
static gint type_rw_lock = 0;
#define G_READ_LOCK(rw_lock) { if (*(rw_lock)!=0) g_error (G_STRLOC": read lock invalid (lock=%u)", *(rw_lock)); *(rw_lock)=1; }
#define G_READ_UNLOCK(rw_lock) { if (*(rw_lock)!=1) g_error (G_STRLOC": read unlock invalid (lock=%u)", *(rw_lock)); *(rw_lock)=0; }
#define G_WRITE_LOCK(rw_lock) { if (*(rw_lock)!=0) g_error (G_STRLOC": write lock invalid (lock=%u)", *(rw_lock)); *(rw_lock)=2; }
#define G_WRITE_UNLOCK(rw_lock) { if (*(rw_lock)!=2) g_error (G_STRLOC": write unlock invalid (lock=%u)", *(rw_lock)); *(rw_lock)=0; }
There are so many problems with it I won't even get started on it. I
assume you're gonna replace this later with some real thing?
/ Alex
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]