Re: GtkTreeView Questions
- From: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- To: Guy Harris <gharris flashcom net>
- Cc: Mikael Hermansson <mikeh bahnhof se>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkTreeView Questions
- Date: 27 Jan 2001 16:31:37 -0500
Guy Harris <gharris flashcom net> writes:
> Doing it "the same way as the old GtkCTree" means it would *definitely*
> be an option; the GtkCTree can either draw the lines or not (and can
> draw them in any one of three styles).
>
> I'd definitely *not* want it to be required; in Ethereal, for example, I
> personally would find the lines distracting (the user can configure, in
> Ethereal, whether they want no lines, solid lines, dotted lines, or
> tabbed lines, those being the four options a GtkCTree offets, and the
> default is "no lines").
>
If there are lines, it will probably be a theme option rather than a
programmer option; the expander style is already a theme option for
TreeView. Lines would only be a programmer option if someone can come
up with a reason why some apps legitimately would want them and others
not, other than aesthetic preference of the app author.
Havoc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]