Re: gtksignal.h bug
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Suresh Chandrasekharan <Suresh Chandrasekharan Eng Sun COM>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gtksignal.h bug
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2001 23:42:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Suresh Chandrasekharan wrote:
> Hi,
> Discovered this while working on libzvt,
> gtk_signal_handler_pending definition in gtk/gtksignal.h need to be
> changed as
>
> #define gtk_signal_handler_pending(object,signal_id,may_be_blocked)
> \
> g_signal_has_handler_pending ((object), (signal_id), 0,
> (may_be_blocked))
>
> for it to have the same argument order as in
> g_signal_has_handler_pending definition.
>
> I'm sort of newbie, so asking if it's OK.
i.e. the current argument order of 0,(signal_id) for the
(signal_id,detail) pair in the macro definition is hosed.
yes, please commit a change that fixes this.
>
> thanks,
> suresh
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]