Re: missing g_signal macros

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On 31 Jul 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes:
> 
> > >  g_signal_connect_after()
> > 
> > No real opinion on this one.
> >   
> > >  g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_data()
> > > 
> > >  g_signal_handlers_block_by_data()
> > >  g_signal_handlers_unblock_by_data()
> > 
> > Tim specifically did not want to add these and I tend to agree
> > with him... if you call g_signal_handlers_disconnect_by_data()
> > and you can't be absolutely sure that no one else has a pointer
> > to the data you are disconnecting, then your code has a 
> > latent bug in it.
> 
> Agreed. What about adding g_signal_connect_after() then? Tim, do 
> you have an opinion on this one?

<sigh>, and after that we add sapped_after, right?
that's why i wanted g_signal_connect() to take GConnectFlags in the
first place, but since we couldn't have that, yeah, go ahead...

> 
> Salut, Sven
> 

---
ciaoTJ