Re: g_signal_*

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

OK, checked over my list of g_signal_ name fixes, and it looks
like things are in good shape now, so I'm closing the corresponding
API bug.

I still think that g_signal_connect_object() is a very unfortunate
naming, and will confuse people badly, but without a really nice
alternative to suggest, I'm willing to live with it, as long
as you answer the FAQ. ;-) 

(g_signal_connect_while_alive() would be better than connect_object()
but I can see where you would object to it, since your function does
slightly more than the name implies.)

Regards,
                                        Owen