Re: gtk nano-X and gtkfb

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

Alexander Larsson <alla lysator liu se> writes: 
> Although the nanox backend hasn't been updated forever, so I doubt it
> compiles.
> 

I'd describe the nanox backend as completely broken and unmaintained.

We recommend the linux-fb backend; nanox is a single-process thing,
right, so you are using the GDK API in any case, not the nanox API. So
framebuffer works just as well, nanox is just bloat.

Havoc