Re: GtkTreeView "activate" signal patch
- From: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Mikael Hermansson <tyan linux se>, Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>, gtk-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: GtkTreeView "activate" signal patch
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 00:04:38 +0100 (CET)
On 16 Mar 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Tim Janik <timj gtk org> writes:
> > not only that, but activate signals also have to stored in
> > GTK_WIDGET_GET_CLASS (widget)->activate_signal_id.
> > i'm not sure activation on double clicks shouldn't be left to
> > the tree view's user though.
> >
>
> This "activate" isn't really that kind of activate, I don't think.
>
> i.e. you wouldn't have a uline accelerator for activating the tree
> view row.
urg, it should have a different name then, for GtkWidget derived objects,
::activate has a pretty certain meaning (yes, ::clicked on GtkButton,
aside ;)
>
> Havoc
>
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]