Re: Redundant GtkWindow destroy_event signal?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 21:07, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming) writes: 
> > It's continuing existence is just confusing. I just had a conversation
> > about GtkObject's "destroy" signal and GtkWindow's "delete_event" signal
> > that was lasted much longer than usual because of the distraction of
> > GtkWindow's "destroy_event" signal.
> 
> You may well want to drop destroy_event out of language bindings
> though. Inti did this.

Yes, we already did, though I didn't know why.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com