Re: gdkcursors.h
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: "Matthias Clasen" <matthiasc poet de>
- Cc: <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gdkcursors.h
- Date: 25 Nov 2001 19:28:23 -0500
"Matthias Clasen" <matthiasc poet de> writes:
> Is there a reason to definition the GdkCursorType enumeration in the way it
> is
> done currently, by including gdkcursors.h inside the enumeration ?
Well, it's done for the sake of the X-derived-headers rule in
gdk/Makefile.am, but since:
* I doubt the set of X cursor defines will _ever_ change.
* If it did, we wouldn't want that to imply a change in the
GDK API accidentally. (We have a problem in gdkkeysyms.h
in that a bunch of non-standard XFree86 only keysyms
snuck in at some point during the 1.3.x series.)
I'm OK with just putting them into gdkcursor.h and deleting
the corresponding rule from the Makefile.
> gtk-doc doesn't grok this, and consequently, my effort on
> documenting the standard cursors doesn't show up in the api docs.
Yeah, I had to back out the changes here before releasing
1.3.11 to get things to compile properly. Should be easy to
restore once things are working properly.
Regrads,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]