Re: g_build_path/filename



On 10 Sep 2001, Owen Taylor wrote:

> Yes, it's not useful, but it keeps the operation more consistent
> and logical to support it. I think g_return_if_fail() statements
> should be there to say "you are doing something wrong" not to
> say "you are doing something pointless."

right ;)
but usually if people do something pointless, that's a good indication
they're doing something erroneous in the first place, so we often
do return_if_fail() on such occasions.

> 
> Regards,
>                                         Owen
> 

---
ciaoTJ





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]