RE: 64-bit analysis of the gtk+ library

["Shivram U" <shivaram upadhyayula wipro com>]

> Shivram U wrote:
>
> >4. Warnings due to VisualIDs being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> >	Would VisualIDs exceed the max value of 2x32-1 (can we have so many
> >VisualIDs :-) ). If so then they may have to be fixed.
> >
> >5. Warnings due to XIDs being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> >	Would these warnings have to be fixed ?
> >
> >6. Warnings due to Atom values being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> >	Would these warnings have to be fixed.
> >
> These are treated as 32 bit quantities by the X protocol.  IIRC, it is
> just the Xlib library that returns these IDs as longs.
   Then these warnings can be safely ignored.

>
> >7. Warnings due to pixel values being treated as 32-bit quantities.
> >	I guess these can be safely ignored.
> >
> >
> >
> I have no idea about this one.
   For example in XColor struct pixel is defined as an unsigned long. The
warning related to pixel values can be ignored, because pixel values would
not exceed 2x32-1 at present. Or would they ?

Best Regards,
Shivram U