Re: Quick GTK+ 2.0.8

[Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>]

Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org> writes:

> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 22:02, Owen Taylor wrote:
> > Arnaud Charlet <charlet ACT-Europe FR> writes:
> > 
> > > > Looks like we need to do a quick 2.0.8 to fix the 
> > > > io-gif.c problem; has anybody seen anything else that 
> > > > should go into this release?
> > > 
> > > Yes, a simple fix for windows:
> > > 
> > > --- glib/glib/glib.def.old      2002-11-05 11:52:22 +0100
> > > +++ glib/glib/glib.def  2002-11-05 11:52:35 +0100
> > > @@ -333,6 +333,7 @@
> > >  	g_main_loop_ref
> > >  	g_main_loop_run
> > >  	g_main_loop_unref
> > > +	g_main_thread_init
> > >  	g_malloc
> > >  	g_malloc0
> > >  	g_markup_error_quark
> > 
> > As you noted, this is a glib issue. I wasn't planning
> > to do a GLib-2.0.8, 
> >
> but shouldn't glib and gtk versions be kept in synchrony? So, if GTK
> 2.0.8 is going to be out, glib 2.0.8 should also, right?
> 
> I'm not arguing about this fix, just about the version numbering.

If you look, you'll see there have been less 2.0.x GLib release
than GTK+ releases. If we don't need to do a GLib release, we just
skip to match the GTK+ number when we next do a release.

Regards,
                                        Owen