Re: status icon AP
- From: Mark McLoughlin <mark skynet ie>
- To: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Devel <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: status icon AP
- Date: 15 Apr 2003 08:35:34 +1200
Hi,
On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 04:06, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Please...
> ! GtkStatusIcon *gtk_status_icon_new (gchar *name);
> ! GtkStatusIcon *gtk_status_icon_new_from_pixbuf (gchar *name,
You just don't get it. You absolutely cannot do this. If a programmer
supplies a pixbuf, you cannot decide to override the supplied pixbuf.
You do not know that that is the desired behaviour.
Furthermore, in future when icon themeing is in gtk+ you now have a
completely defunct argument. How do you document @pixbuf when that
happens? "Set this to NULL, it does nothing. It was temporarily used in
gtk+ 2.4". What a mess.
The reality is that a) for gtk+ 2.4 Owen expects icon themeing to be in
gtk+, in which case we would have a named icon version of the API and b)
if people use the libegg version of this for GNOME 2.4 it will probably
have icon themeing using libgnomeui.
Good Luck,
Mark.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]